Why Is Everyone Talking About Asbestos Settlement Right Now
Asbestos Bankruptcy Trusts
Generally, asbestos bankruptcy trusts are typically established by companies who have filed for bankruptcy. Trusts are then able to pay personal injury claims for those who were exposed to asbestos. At least 56 asbestos bankruptcy trusts have been set up in the late 1970s.
Armstrong World Industries Asbestos Trust
Armstrong World Industries was founded in 1860 in Pittsburgh. It is the largest wine bottle cork producer in the world. It employs over 3000 people and asbestos litigation has 26 manufacturing facilities around the globe.
In the beginning the company employed asbestos in a variety of products such as insulation, tiles and vinyl flooring. Workers were exposed to asbestos commercial, which could cause serious health issues such as mesothelioma and lung cancer.
The asbestos-containing products of Armstrong were extensively used in commercial, residential and military construction industries. Because of the exposure, thousands of Armstrong employees were affected by asbestos-related illnesses.
Although asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral, it is not safe to be consumed by humans. It is also known as a fireproofing material. Companies have created trusts in order to pay victims for asbestos' dangers.
A trust was created to compensate victims of Armstrong World Industries' bankruptcy. The trust paid out more than 200,000 claims in the first two years. The total amount of compensation was greater than $2B.
The trust is owned by Armor TPG Holdings, a private equity firm. The company owned over 25% of the fund at the beginning of 2013.
According to the Asbestos Victims Compensation Trust, the company is estimated to be accountable for more than $1 billion in personal injury claims. The trust has more than $2 billion in reserves to cover claims.
Celotex Asbestos Trust
Celotex Corporation was a distributor and manufacturer of building materials. During the 1980s, Celotex Corporation was hit by a flood of lawsuits claiming asbestos-related damage. These claims, in addition to other were a slew of billions of dollars in damages.
In 1990, Celotex filed for bankruptcy protection. To process asbestos-related claims, the Asbestos Settlement Trust was created through Celotex's reorganization program. The Trust filed an action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Saiber L.L.C. represented the Trust.
The trust sought coverage under two policies of excess comprehensive general liability insurance. One policy provided coverage of five million dollars. While the other provided coverage for 6.6 million. The trust also requested coverage from Jim Walter Corporation. It could not find any evidence to suggest that the trust was legally required to provide notice to those who had additional insurances.
Celotex Asbestos Trust submitted proofs of bodily injury claims on December 31, 2004. The trust also made a motion to overturn the special master's ruling.
Celotex had less that $7 million of primary coverage when it filed, but believed future asbestos litigation would affect its coverage. Celotex actually anticipated the need for several layers of excess insurance coverage. Despite this the bankruptcy court concluded that there was no evidence to establish that Celotex gave adequate notice to its insurance companies that had excess coverage.
The Celotex Asbestos Settlement Trust is a complicated process. In addition to settling claims for asbestos-related illnesses it also has the responsibility of paying claims against Philip Carey (formerly Canadian Mine).
The process can be confusing. The trust offers a user-friendly claim management tool as well an interactive website. A page is also available on the website to address claims issues.
Christy Refractories Asbestos Trust
Christy Refractories originally had an insurance pool of $45 million. In the beginning of 2010, the company filed for bankruptcy. The filing was to settle asbestos lawsuits. Christy Refractories' insurers have been settling asbestos lawyer claims for approximately $1 million per month for the past three years.
Over 20 billion dollars distributed from asbestos trust funds since the late 1980s. These funds can be used to pay for the loss of income and therapy costs. Among these funds are the Western MacArthur Trust, the M.H. Detrick Asbestos Trust and Thorpe Insulation Settlement Trust are among these funds. Porter Asbestos Trust.
The Thorpe Company's products included insulation and refractory materials which contained asbestos. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2002, but later reemerged in the year 2006. It has handled more than 4,500 claims.
The Western MacArthur Trust has paid out more than $1.1 billion in claims. Pneumo Corporation, Abex Corporation and Synkoloid all used asbestos in their products. The United States Gypsum Company also used asbestos in its products.
The Utex Industries, Inc. Successor Trust has paid out more than 2,000 asbestos claims. It also supplied sealing products to the oil industry.
The Prudential Lines Trust faced hundreds of lawsuits, mass tort actions, and a 20-year limit on paying out the funds.
The Western MacArthur Asbestos Settlement Trust has paid out more than $500 million in claims. It also manages claims against Yarway.
The Thorpe Insulation Settlement Trust covers the Pacific Insulation Company and the Thorpe Insulation Company.
Federal Mogul's Asbestos PI Trust
It was originally proposed in 2007 Federal Mogul's Asbestos Personal Injury Trust was first filed in 2007. It's a trust that is meant to aid those suffering from asbestos exposure. The Federal Mogul Asbestos PI Trust is a trust in bankruptcy which provides financial compensation for illnesses that were caused by asbestos exposure.
Initial assets of 400 million dollars were used to establish the trust in Pennsylvania. Following its establishment it made payments of millions to people who were claiming.
The trust is now located in Southfield, MI. It is comprised of three separate coffers of cash. Each is used to handle the processing of claims against entities who produce asbestos-related products for Federal-Mogul.
The main goal of the trust is to provide financial compensation for asbestos-related illnesses among approximately 2,000 occupations that employ asbestos. The trust has already paid more than $1 billion in claims.
The US Bankruptcy Court estimated the asbestos liabilities' value to be about $9 billion. It was also determined that creditors should maximize the value of assets.
In 2007, the Asbestos PI Trust (PI Trust) was established. Elihu Inselbuch was a partner at the firm Caplin & Drysdale and served as the Trust attorney.
To handle claims, the trust has established Trust Distribution Procedures (or TDPs). These TDPs are intended to be fair to all claimants. They are based on the historical precedents for substantially similar claims in the US tort system.
Reorganization safeguards asbestos companies from mesothelioma lawsuits
Many asbestos lawsuits are settled each year, due in part to the bankruptcy courts. As a result, big corporations are employing innovative strategies to access the judicial system. One such technique is the reorganization. This allows the company's activities to continue, and offers relief to creditors who are not paid. Moreover, it may be possible for the company to be shielded from lawsuits filed by individuals.
In an organization reorganization, the trust fund for asbestos victims can be established. These funds can be distributed in the form of gifts, cash or other forms of payment. The reorganization mentioned above is an initial funding proposal and is followed by a court-approved reorganization strategy. A trustee is appointed once an reorganization is approved. This may be an individual, a bank, or a third party. The most effective reorganization will benefit all affected.
Aside from announcing a new strategy for bankruptcy courts, the restructuring offers some effective legal tools. It's not surprising that a lot of companies have filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Certain asbestos companies were required to file chapter 7 bankruptcy in order to be safe. For instance, Georgia-Pacific LLC filed for chapter 7 in 2009. The reason is straightforward. Georgia-Pacific applied for an order of reorganization in order to defend itself from a flood of mesothelioma-related lawsuit. It also rolled all its assets into one. It has been selling its most valuable assets in order to take control of its financial problems.
FACT Act
The "Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency Act" is currently in Congress. It will make it harder to claim fraudulently against asbestos trusts. The legislation will make it more difficult to claim fraudulent claims against asbestos trusts and will allow defendants unlimited access to information during litigation.
The FACT Act requires that asbestos trusts publish a list of plaintiffs on a public court docket. They are also required to disclose the names and exposure history as well as compensation amounts paid these claimants. These reports, which are publically accessible, can stop fraud from occurring.
The FACT Act would also require trusts to share any other information, including payment details even if they are part of confidential settlements. The Environmental Working Group's report on FACT Act revealed that 19 House Judiciary Committee members voted for the bill. They also received campaign contributions from asbestos-related interests.
The FACT Act is a giveaway for asbestos companies with huge profits. It would also cause delays in the compensation process. Additionally, it creates significant privacy concerns for victims. The bill is also a complex piece of legislation.
In addition to the data that is required to be made public in addition to the information required to be released, the FACT Act also prohibits the release of social security numbers, medical records and other information that is protected by bankruptcy laws. It's also harder to obtain justice in courts.
The FACT Act is a red herring, besides the obvious question of how victims could be compensated. The Environmental Working Group examined the House Judiciary committee's most notable achievements and found that 19 members were given corporate contributions to campaigns.