Difference between revisions of "Free Speech Why Does The Silent Majority Exist"
m |
TwylaHvu074 (talk | contribs) m |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Free Speech: Why Does The 'Silent Majority" Exist? | + | [http://bazaarworks.com/__media__/js/netsoltrademark.php?d=wiki-club.win%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3D10_Things_You_Learned_in_Preschool_That%2527ll_Help_You_With_praca_za_granic%25C4%2585 praca za granicą niemcy] - [https://companyriviera.eu/index.php/k2-categories/item/206-slide1 https://companyriviera.eu/index.php/k2-categories/item/206-slide1]; Free Speech: Why Does The 'Silent Majority" Exist? In recent years, there have been a number of surprising results in the political realm, and this is often put down to the fact that there is a ‘silent majority’. At the same time, it wouldn’t be accurate to say that everyone was taken aback by these results. The Difference What this comes down to is that there were people who strongly believed that Trump would win or that Brexit would take place, for instance.<br><br> One way of looking at this would be to say that what they believed would happen just happened to occur. Another way of looking at this would be to say the reason these people believed this was because of the information that they were exposed to. The news source that they paid attention to was likely to have played a big part. Two Extremes The alternative media generally believed that Trump would win and that Brexit would take place; whereas the mainstream media largely believed that the opposite would take place.<br><br> Therefore, through paying attention to the alternative media, someone could have ended up with a completely different outlook to the person who only paid attention to the mainstream media. So, while both of these news sources were reporting on the same thing in both cases, it was as if they were reporting on something completely different. What someone saw on social media during this time may also have played a part in what they believed would happen. The General Theme If someone spent time looking through their news feed around this time, they may have come across a lot of articles and comments that were in support of Hillary or staying in the European Union.<br><br> They may have come across posts and comments that were in favour of Trump or leaving the European Union, but this might have been something that rarely occurred. Based on this information alone, there would have been no reason for them to believe that Trump would win or that Brexit would actually happen. Along with this, it was probably the same when they were around people in the real world. No Different One may have typically heard people talk about how they wanted Hillary to win or that they wanted to stay in the European Union.<br><br> Their friends and family may have also have had same outlook. Ergo, if one only paid attention to the mainstream media, what they saw on social media, and what other people were saying offline, it would be perfectly normal for them to have believed that the opposite of what took place would have taken place. However, even though their friends and family were just sharing their views, one would have thought that the mainstream media would have got it right. Out of Touch After all, this is supposed to be the source that is in tune with what is taking place in the world.<br><br> Yet, as the mainstream media is run by human beings, it could be said that it is bound to make mistakes from time to time But while some people are going to accept this explanation; it is not going to be good enough for everyone. |
Latest revision as of 02:19, 31 May 2023
praca za granicą niemcy - https://companyriviera.eu/index.php/k2-categories/item/206-slide1; Free Speech: Why Does The 'Silent Majority" Exist? In recent years, there have been a number of surprising results in the political realm, and this is often put down to the fact that there is a ‘silent majority’. At the same time, it wouldn’t be accurate to say that everyone was taken aback by these results. The Difference What this comes down to is that there were people who strongly believed that Trump would win or that Brexit would take place, for instance.
One way of looking at this would be to say that what they believed would happen just happened to occur. Another way of looking at this would be to say the reason these people believed this was because of the information that they were exposed to. The news source that they paid attention to was likely to have played a big part. Two Extremes The alternative media generally believed that Trump would win and that Brexit would take place; whereas the mainstream media largely believed that the opposite would take place.
Therefore, through paying attention to the alternative media, someone could have ended up with a completely different outlook to the person who only paid attention to the mainstream media. So, while both of these news sources were reporting on the same thing in both cases, it was as if they were reporting on something completely different. What someone saw on social media during this time may also have played a part in what they believed would happen. The General Theme If someone spent time looking through their news feed around this time, they may have come across a lot of articles and comments that were in support of Hillary or staying in the European Union.
They may have come across posts and comments that were in favour of Trump or leaving the European Union, but this might have been something that rarely occurred. Based on this information alone, there would have been no reason for them to believe that Trump would win or that Brexit would actually happen. Along with this, it was probably the same when they were around people in the real world. No Different One may have typically heard people talk about how they wanted Hillary to win or that they wanted to stay in the European Union.
Their friends and family may have also have had same outlook. Ergo, if one only paid attention to the mainstream media, what they saw on social media, and what other people were saying offline, it would be perfectly normal for them to have believed that the opposite of what took place would have taken place. However, even though their friends and family were just sharing their views, one would have thought that the mainstream media would have got it right. Out of Touch After all, this is supposed to be the source that is in tune with what is taking place in the world.
Yet, as the mainstream media is run by human beings, it could be said that it is bound to make mistakes from time to time But while some people are going to accept this explanation; it is not going to be good enough for everyone.